Tailorable Force-Sensing Skins for Manipulators Using Textile and Additive Manufacturing

Anonymous Authors

Per-Link Material Cost

< $10

Two Complementary Designs

Textile + AM

Demonstrated Tasks

Contact Avoidance + Embracing

Abstract

Robotic manipulation in human-centered and cluttered environments requires not only precise end-effector control but also the ability to sense and regulate contact forces across the entire arm. Restricting tactile sensing to the fingertips or gripper limits a robot's ability to detect, modulate, and safely respond to contact occurring along its links during motion. Whole-arm tactile sensing enables both contact avoidance and deliberate contact exploitation, yet practical tactile skins remain difficult to realize due to trade-offs between fabrication cost, surface coverage, sensing density, usable force range, and long-term repeatability. We present two complementary whole-arm tactile skin architectures that jointly address this trade-off: a textile-based design optimized for low-force sensitivity and contact avoidance, and a 3D-printed conformal shell design optimized for higher-force, durable contact embracing. Both designs use a resistive taxel matrix and cost under $10 per link. We provide fabrication guidelines, tunable design parameters, and quantitative characterization of force range, repeatability, and hysteresis. Experiments on a mobile manipulator demonstrate both contact avoidance and controlled contact-embracing behaviors in real-world tasks.

Sensor Architectures

Textile Sensor

  • Flexible sleeve with conductive fabric rows and columns separated by Velostat.
  • Near-zero detection threshold in flat configuration and strong low-force sensitivity.
  • Best suited for contact avoidance and light-touch interaction.
  • Fabrication requires only simple textile tooling (for example, a fabric iron).

AM Sensor

  • 3D-printed conformal inner and outer TPU shells with ridge-defined taxels and Velostat.
  • Normally open structure reduces cross-talk and improves localization robustness.
  • Best suited for contact embracing and higher-force, durable interaction.
  • Generated from link geometry for direct deployment on complex robot surfaces.
Overview of textile and AM sensor designs

Real-World Use Cases

Contact Avoidance (Textile)

The textile skin detects light, unexpected contact and drives contact-aware whole-body inverse kinematics to move the contacted link away while preserving the primary end-effector goal.

Contact Embracing (AM)

The AM skin supports controlled, higher-force interaction such as bracing on a door while balancing a tool, enabling stable force regulation during task execution.

Modeling and Characterization

Each taxel is measured through a voltage-divider circuit and mapped to force using a calibrated power-law resistance model with base resistance. We evaluate: (1) operating force range from detection threshold to saturation, (2) multi-force repeatability using coefficient of variation across cycles, and (3) hysteresis via loading-unloading discrepancy.

Metric Textile Sensor AM Sensor
Minimum Detectable Force Very low (near-zero in flat setup) Higher (designed gap before contact closes)
Repeatability Stable across repeated cycles Comparable repeatability under matched calibration
Hysteresis Lower Higher due to shell viscoelastic effects
Cross-talk More susceptible Reduced by normally open architecture
Characterization and deployment results figure

Additional Video Gallery

Fabric Door

Fabric Human Interaction

Fabric Table

TPU Gripper

TPU Table

Fabric Avoid